Blog 1

Humanity or Nature

In “Nature” by R.W.Emerson, the importance of nature, the discussion of spirituality, and the understanding of the world are discussed. In the introduction, Emerson speaks about how humans have beliefs and traditions that try to understand the world, and he begins to question why we continue to follow these beliefs. He begins to ask questions such as “why should we gripe among the dry bones of the past, or put out the living generation masquerade out of its faded wardrobe”(Emerson 1). This question is very important as the reader begins to see the message he is trying to deliver. Emerson does not understand why people are still holding on to old values and accepting these old values rather than living and experiencing the present and creating new traditions based on the present. He wants people to realize the importance of nature and how understanding it will help people understand the world. He is trying to tell the reader that the only way to understand the world is to experience nature and to create beliefs and values based on these experiences.

In this poem, it is clear that Emerson believes in God and also believes in spirituality. He believes that to understand the world, we must form a spiritual connection with the nature around us. Emerson wants people to perceive the world and nature in different ways to be able to establish a connection with them. We see this not only from the introduction but also in chapter one. He gives nature many spiritual connections and gives them significant meanings. For example, he goes on to describe the sky and stars, he says, “The rays that come from those heavenly worlds, will separate between him and what he touches”(Emerson 1). From this line alone, we can see the importance that Emerson has given the sky. He gives the sky a divine nature and also gives the sky a very important role in which it decides what the man looking at it can see and touch. Another example is the way Emerson describes the stars and the importance he gives them. This is what he says about the stars, “The stars awaken a certain reverence, because though always present, they are inaccessible; but all natural objects make a kindred impression when the mind is open to their influence”(Emerson 1). He tells the readers that the stars are always in the sky whenever and wherever they look at them but the experience that can be received from looking at the stars is different each time. He is using nature, in this case, the stars, to describe to the readers how understanding nature can help them understand the world. He reverts to the points he made in the introduction which was that we must be able to perceive the world in the present and forget traditions and values. If we do not learn to understand nature and begin to perceive the world differently, we will get nowhere in understanding it. Emerson wants humans to see the importance of nature and how divine it truly is, he wants the readers to realize that nature is not man-made and it is linked all together. Nature is one and whole, not separate.

This point made by Emerson is way different than the points that were made by Du Bois. In “The Souls of Black Folk”, he focused more on human nature and discussed perception with the reader. Du Bois wants readers to see his experiences as a “negro” and wants the reader to see how it affected him. Unlike Emerson, he focuses on changing human nature and years for a fair and equal world. We can see this is what he wants when he says, “He simply wishes to make it possible for a man to be both a Negro and an American, without being cursed and spit upon by his fellows, without having the doors of Opportunity closed roughly in his face”(Du Bois 1). We can see the distinction between the two and how different their messages are. Even though they are both different it is interesting to see and read both of their works since they both cover “nature”.

Milky Way, Rocks, Night, Landscape, Silhouette, Sky

Blogging 101

A central feature of this course will be the writing we do on this site.  In what follows, I will outline three things:

  • a rationale for why I ask you to blog in the first place, rather than write traditional essays
  • a quick primer on how to create your first post
  • a simple rubric to guide your writing + an example of a good-looking post

First things first: why blog?

1. Blogging is sharable: rather than have a private circuit between you and me, we have a much more dynamic conversation across the entire class.

2. Blogging is public, sort of: I like the idea that we are responsible for our ideas in front of broader audiences.  In practical terms, I doubt anyone is listening in most of the time, but I think it’s important that we roll up our sleeves and defend our arguments in an open and public forum as often as possible.  And of course, you can show your family/friends/pets what we’ve been up to in class.  For those who have reservations about privacy, note that a) I’m happy to help you get a username with some anonymity, so you have relative privacy beyond our class; and b) you are free to delete your posts at the end of class.  If anyone has serious reservations despite all this, feel free to contact me.

3. Blogging is sturdy: rather than forget the piece of paper once it’s been handed back, we can link back to prior statements or observations, or to each others’. If you like, you can leave your posts up for future students to see.

4. Blogging is responsive: rather than only getting comments from me, you’ll comment on and get comments on each other’s work.

So how do you post? Here’s a quick guide to posting on WordPress for newbies. It’s super easy once you figure it out the first time. So here goes:

1. Make sure you’re logged in: if you’re logged in, you’ll see your avatar in the upper-right-hand corner of the window. If you aren’t, you’ll see the text “log in.”

2. START A POST: there are several ways to post. Here’s the easiest: click the <+ NEW> icon in the top middle of the screen and select “post.” It looks like this:

Screenshot 2016-01-27 22.00.33

3. WRITE SOMETHING: “New Post” will take you to a basic text editor. So write something. If you want to get fancy, you can add italics, bold, indentation, insert images or other media, and whatnot. But most of the time you’ll just try to write some reasonable sentences. When you’re done, click PUBLISH on the right (see image below). Or, if you’re not quite ready, you can save it as a draft and reopen it later, via the “POSTS” section of the dashboard. Helpful hint: WordPress autosaves your work every few seconds, so it’s very, very rare to lose stuff. Nonetheless it’s not a bad idea to compose posts on a word processor and then paste them into WP just in case. I personally live dangerously most of the time and have never lost anything, but your call.

If you want to get really fancy, add a tag or two or some media. In the right-hand column, you’ll see a bunch of options. Most of the time you can ignore most of them, but “tags” allows you to add, say, the name of the author you’re writing about or a topic that you hit in the post. So for a post on Du Bois, you might tag it “Du Bois,” “SOULS,” and/or “double consciousness.” If you want to add media, for example a relevant image, click “add media” in the top left-hand part of the window and follow the prompts.

We’re good, right? Happy blogging.

What makes for an excellent post? For this class, posts should:

  • be between 400-800 words (use word count in WordPress or your word processor)
  • explain a given text’s argument (for secondary readings) or analyze its form and themes (for primary readings), using quotations and paraphrases of the text with page numbers in parentheses
  • engage a text critically, noting its limitations, its links to other texts we’ve read, its unstated assumptions, etc.

Here’s a simple rubric, adapted from Mark Sample, that I will use to evaluate your work (see how the academic blogosphere encourages sharing and exchange? I told you so!):

Rating Characteristics
A Exceptional. The post articulates a clear, original argument that is well-supported with textual evidence. The argument is “weird,” examining aspects of the text that will not be obvious to casual readers. It develops organically, leaving readers in a different place than they started, preferably with some gestures of introduction and conclusion. Where possible, it gestures to peers’ posts or other relevant criticism.
B Satisfactory. The post is reasonably focused, and provides textual evidence to support its argument. Its argument is coherent if perhaps a bit predictable.
C Underdeveloped. The post privileges summary or description over analysis,  without consideration of alternative perspectives, and may contain misreadings of the text. The entry reflects passing engagement with the topic.
D Limited. The journal entry is unfocused, or simply rehashes others’ comments; it fails to settle on any consistent argument.
0 No Credit. The journal entry is missing or consists of one or two disconnected sentences.

Last but not least, here’s an example of a good-looking post.  I’ve linked to it in a Word doc so you can see some marginal comments that explain why it’s good.  And remember: it’s not an exercise in cookie-cutting: your results may vary, and there are lots of ways to write an excellent post.

 

welcome

This is just to welcome new students to the course. We’ll start in earnest on Thursday via Zoom. In the meantime, peruse this site, check for the email I sent earlier this week for links to: the syllabus, readings, a brief survey, and Zoom links, and get ready to work hard and learn a lot this term.

 

If you’re curious, you can learn a bit more about me here.