prompt for asynchronous class 11/19

For Thursday’s asynchronous session this week, you will explore the various “situations” found in section VI of Rankine’s text. Choose one of the videos produced by Rankine and John Lucas, which you can find on Rankine’s site, and view it alongside the corresponding moment in Rankine’s text. In 500-800 words, posted to our blog, respond to the “situation.” You might consider:

  • why is it called a “situation”? How does this text “situate” the speaker and the subjects it deals with? What are other valences of the word “situation” that might come into play?
  • how does the text interact with the moving images? how does it “read” differently when viewing it as a film rather than reading it in a book. What does it mean that Rankine has supplemented her printed text in this way?
  • what are the major themes in this “situation” and how does it relate to the rest of Rankine’s text?

Claudia Rankine talk “at” Hunter College THIS THURSDAY

The wonderful Distinguished Writers Series at Hunter is hosting Claudia Rankine this Thursday at 6:30. She’s talking about her new book, Just Us, which is fantastic and completes a trilogy along with Don’t Let Me Be Lonely and Citizen.

Please check it out. Info on how to register here:

https://hunter.cuny.edu/event/distinguished-writers-series-claudia-rankine/

Anyone who attends and posts at least a paragraph on their impressions will get either:

–amnesty from one missing blog post

–5 points boost on their midterm

Cheers!

asynchronous session 11/12

We’re going to keep things simple today. No video lecture, nothing due on this blog. Instead, you will read the interview of Claudia Rankine by literary critic/theorist Lauren Berlant:

https://via.hypothes.is/https://bombmagazine.org/articles/claudia-rankine/

The link takes you to the article with hypothes.is enabled. Make sure to select our ENGL252 group and annotate away: you’ll notice that I’ve posed a bunch of questions to guide you, but of course feel free as always to highlight your own passages and make your own notes, or to comment on other’s comments.

And keep reading: on Monday we’ll discuss the entire text. Also remember that your “simple,” unannotated bibliography for the final project is due on the blog for Monday.

asynchronous activity for 11/5

As usual, we will be async today and meet again on Monday with Jennifer Newman, where you’ll learn about finding sources for your research questions that you’ll generate prior to class.

Today, you’ll watch a 15 minute lecture on Rankine and choose one of three writing prompts (below). As usual, you’ll post your response to the blog.

Here’s a link to Dropbox:

Rankine-CITIZEN1+2.mp4

Shared with Dropbox

And for those who would like captions, here’s the same thing on YouTube:

Rankine CITIZEN1+2

No Description

You have a choice of writing prompts this time. Please choose one of the following and respond in 500-1000 words on the blog. As always, make sure to include direct references to the text (quotation or paraphrase) and have a clear argument.
  1. Choose an image or two to read and talk about how still images and videos interact with the printed text. How does the image “illustrate” the text? How might the text be read, conversely, as a “caption” of the image? More broadly, why do you think Rankine puts such emphasis on the visual in a book that labels itself as a “lyric,” a mode usually associated with words and sounds only?
  2. Discuss Rankine’s use of grammatical person (i.e., the “I/we” of the first person, the “you” of the second, and the “he/she/they” of the third). Choose a passage from the text and give a “close reading” of Rankine’s use of pronouns: what’s unusual or unexpected about her use of “person”? Why does she use the pronouns she uses? Who or what seem to be the “antecedents” the pronoun/s point to?
  3. What links can you make with other texts from the course (and you may mention anything from Emerson, Hurston, and Fanon up to our readings of Ellison and Morrison)? Are there direct allusions to anything we read? Are there particular authors/moments that seem especially relevant to Rankine’s narrative?

asynchronous activity for 10/28

As discussed on Monday, you’ve got a pretty simple job today. I’ve posted two academic articles on Morrison’s novel. Your job is to read them (duh) and comment on them using hypothes.is. A couple of things to think about:

  • use the 252 group! Make sure to join if you haven’t: https://hypothes.is/groups/1Y7zVbmM/allred252fa20. And make sure to select it, rather than “public,” from the pull-down.
  • note the different approaches to the same text:
    • the Werrlein piece is solidly in the “cultural studies” tradition, which emphasizes that literature is part of a spectrum of cultural forms, from Hollywood to advertising to traditional “folk” forms, and that literature does “cultural work” on its readers, aligning them with certain belief systems or political persuasions.
    • the Roye piece is indebted another strain of Marxist cultural traditions, “postcolonial” criticism, which emphasizes the embeddedness of literary works in long histories of colonial domination of the Global South and emphasizes the workings of struggles over class, race, and gender within literary texts and between those texts and the world they engage.
  • For Monday, we’ll look at a very different perspective on Morrison’s work, that of the philosopher George Yancey, getting a taste of a more interdisciplinary approach to the text, so come on Monday ready to roll your sleeves up and think comparatively about different critical approaches.