asynchronous activity for 10/28

As discussed on Monday, you’ve got a pretty simple job today. I’ve posted two academic articles on Morrison’s novel. Your job is to read them (duh) and comment on them using hypothes.is. A couple of things to think about:

  • use the 252 group! Make sure to join if you haven’t: https://hypothes.is/groups/1Y7zVbmM/allred252fa20. And make sure to select it, rather than “public,” from the pull-down.
  • note the different approaches to the same text:
    • the Werrlein piece is solidly in the “cultural studies” tradition, which emphasizes that literature is part of a spectrum of cultural forms, from Hollywood to advertising to traditional “folk” forms, and that literature does “cultural work” on its readers, aligning them with certain belief systems or political persuasions.
    • the Roye piece is indebted another strain of Marxist cultural traditions, “postcolonial” criticism, which emphasizes the embeddedness of literary works in long histories of colonial domination of the Global South and emphasizes the workings of struggles over class, race, and gender within literary texts and between those texts and the world they engage.
  • For Monday, we’ll look at a very different perspective on Morrison’s work, that of the philosopher George Yancey, getting a taste of a more interdisciplinary approach to the text, so come on Monday ready to roll your sleeves up and think comparatively about different critical approaches.

NYTimes piece on Angela Davis

Check out this long, detailed profile on Angela Davis, Toni Morrison’s rough contemporary whose life and work interacts in interesting ways with the novel:

 

Angela Davis Still Believes America Can Change (Published 2020)

Since the 1970s, the academic and activist has been an icon of feminism and Black liberation. Today, as the battle for equality wages on, the ideas for which she’s long advocated have finally entered mainstream thought.

 

 

Pretty (Ugly) Polly

Polly’s main insecurity that has lasted her her whole life is just one incredibly multidimensional feeling: the feeling of being ugly. Throughout her life, she encounters many moments, places, people, and practices that all sustain her by providing pleasure and returning respect. However, they also end up becoming the disruptions to her development with time. One of the first things that makes her feel this ugliness is her lame foot. However, Cholly is the first person in many years who treats her foot as an “asset” rather than as a “bad foot.” He seems to be the only person in her life who provides her the simple pleasure of feeling confident enough to think that she is deserving of a gentle love. Instead of being ignored, Polly finally has a chance to feel beautiful because of his love and support. 

However, this feeling is soon distorted when Cholly becomes more abusive and unattentive. Unfortunately, the same man who had made Polly feel so beautiful despite her deformity is the one who is now actively rooting against her attempts to make herself feel more physically beautiful, which can be seen when she tries to fit in with the other women in their new town. Cholly’s change in temperament can be seen through the way he chastises his wife for buying new makeup and clothes. His lack of support in Polly wanting to change herself is not one of a supportive husband who wants his wife to see the natural beauty within herself. Rather, he is only upset that she is wasting money to feed her desires. Through this, it can be seen that Cholly slowly loses the love that he once had for Polly, and that he no longer provides Polly the feeling of being worthy. Now, she is back to being “unworthy” and she is considered a waste of money.

The movies also provide Polly pleasure but, later on, contribute as a catalyst to her disrupted development. She describes her times at the movies as “…a simple pleasure, but she learned all there was to love and all there was to hate.” The things “she learned all there was to love” from the movies are all based on white femininity and beauty. She learns to love how white women look in films, the way that they are treated by their partners, and even the way their houses look; she learns to love all aspects of whiteness, which are the stark contrasts of her own black reality. Thus, by learning to love something so different to her own life is where she also learns “all there was to hate.” She learns to hate herself and the way she looks, the way that she is treated by her partner, and the way her house looks, which can be seen when she says, “them pictures gave me a lot of pleasure, but it made coming home hard, and looking at Cholly hard.”

 Additionally, the movie theater is also where Polly experiences a pivotal moment of feeling true ugliness: her front tooth falls out. This moment is critical to her disrupted development, and the irony of her situation is what makes her feel so hopelessly ugly. Before her tooth falls out, Polly is growing more aware of her ugliness, but she still has hope, which can be seen when she tries to improve her appearances by doing things such as dressing up to the movie theater as one of her favorite white actresses who she regards as very beautiful. So, it is when she is feeling her best when she finally ends up realizing that she could never be beautiful with her tooth missing. Polly is finally defeated, which can be seen when she un-pins her hair because she realizes that her ugliness can never be fixed.

The love for whiteness that she learns from the movies then becomes ingrained into her life when she starts working for the Fishers. Here, she is able to be around everything she learned to love, which provides her with both pleasure and power. She is not only able to enjoy her hobby of rearranging rooms, but she is also able to gain the respect of white people when she is around the Fishers. However, this site of pleasure and power only applies when she is with the Fishers; there are no other people in her life who tell her that they would never get rid of her, even if they only refer to Polly as a servant they would never get rid of, rather than a friend or family member. It is still where Polly feels most beautiful and wanted, which are the feelings Cholly is no longer able to give her, both because of his abuse and the aforementioned hate that Polly learned in the movies. 

This hate, however, does not just translate to her relationship with Cholly – it also translates to her relationship with her own daughter. This can be seen by the contrast in behavior between Polly and the little Fisher girl and Polly and Pecola. When Claudia and her sister visit Pecola, Polly comforts the little Fisher girl rather than comforting Pecola, who is crying out in pain. She acts very motherly to the white girl, which is a characteristic that has never been observed by the reader before. To her own daughter, however, she yells at her and even physically handles her and tells her to leave the house, as if Pecola is an intruder rather than her own child. This contrast is further sharpened when it is revealed that this pie was actually baked by Pecola for the Fishers; clearly, Polly had never baked her own family this pie, which can be seen by Pecola’s initial curiosity towards it. Thus, to Polly, her own family, and even Polly herself, are too “ugly” to be deserving of these beautiful pies; only the beautiful white Fishers with the beautiful house are deserving of them.

quick review of last week’s asynchronous session

I just finished reading all of the blog posts from last Thursday’s asynchronous session. All were good, reflecting as requested on either of the “flashback” narratives focused on Pauline or Cholly. All convincingly and in detailed fashion described the external event and internal dynamics that lead to Pecola’s destruction through intergenerational trauma.

I do want to push you as a group, however, to move beyond summary as your central critical mode to embrace a more analytical approach. In other words:

  • assume we readers know basics of plot and character: If your work starts by telling us “what happens,” you’re not starting in the right place. We know what happens; we need to know what it means.
  • be a little “weird”: for this exercise, most casual readers probably get that the trauma of the parents is visited on the child. So an argument that sticks to that basic point will be convincing but not very original. Try to find something in the narrative–perhaps the face that Morrison gives us “testimony” from Polly and Cholly for the first time, or the role of color in the text or the analogy between the house Polly cleans and a movie set–that casual readers will have missed.

There were lots of good posts. I want to call out two in particular that do a lot of what I’m asking for here. Nadine’s post explores the machinery that produces “beauty” and “ugliness” in the novel, including some images of Jean Harlow and 40s “bombshell” actresses. George’s explores the ironic role of “freedom” in Cholly’s formation.