Citizen and Normalized Dehumanization

The second image in Rankine’s Citizen is fascinating as much for its layered meaning as its viscerally disturbing nature. The best way to describe it, superficially, is a human face mapped onto a deer or other small animal. The deer is in a vulnerable position, matching the face’s confused, troubled expression. The image is contextualized directly by the text that precedes it; Rankine discusses an ironically traumatic experience at the office of a therapist who “specializes in trauma counseling” (22). A reference to “deer grass,” specifically in her description of the moments before the screaming begins, implies a connection between the narrator and animal. This is furthered by the description of the startled therapist as “a wounded Doberman pinscher or a German shepherd,” which creates a predator-prey relationship where there should be one of openness and vulnerability; the mention of “rosemary” alongside deer grass becomes sinister, bringing to mind its food connotations (22). These elements are all combined into the form of the image on the next page, the uncanny animal becoming the image of a human victimized. The humanity of the animal is, of course, accentuated by its human face. The face is not a normal skin color, but the features seem to suggest that this is an African-American face mapped onto the animal. The racial implications of the interaction between the narrator and the therapist, if they were at all unclear before, become fully textual. The combination of animal and human can now be understood as an expression of the inhumanity to which African-Americans are often subjected. The narrator’s final words in the preceding passage, “I’m so sorry, so, so sorry,” feed into both this societal subservience and the nearly-wounded positioning of the deer (22).

The unsettling nature of the deer’s face is another site rich with multiple meanings. The unsettling nature of the artificial, Photoshopped face brings to mind the concept of the uncanny valley, the capacity for computer-generated images which look close to humans without fully achieving the effect look much more upsetting than more perfect or less precise representations. The dots on the face, the weird cropping, and the unnatural color make the face on the animal seem wrong, almost damaged or disfigured. Given the preceding text, it seems that Rankine is making a strong statement on the capacity for white people to perceive the humanity of Black people. The human-faced deer is unquestionably similar to the average human, but with enough visible alterations that a feeling of wrongness is created. It is as if someone made a clumsy attempt at hybridizing a deer and a human in Photoshop, which again stands as a good metaphor for the manner in which people such as the trauma therapist make attempts at helping others without unraveling their own fear and prejudice. A strange line, that “the bell is a small round disc that you press firmly,” is finally recontextualized from an odd description to an alien experience on the narrator’s end (22). She is so far removed from her environment that she can not even recognize a doorbell button, both herself and the therapist experiencing distressing strangeness, but with one of them able to retreat into the comfort of whiteness while the other must be constantly seen as an animal.

asynchronous activity for 11/5

As usual, we will be async today and meet again on Monday with Jennifer Newman, where you’ll learn about finding sources for your research questions that you’ll generate prior to class.

Today, you’ll watch a 15 minute lecture on Rankine and choose one of three writing prompts (below). As usual, you’ll post your response to the blog.

Here’s a link to Dropbox:

Rankine-CITIZEN1+2.mp4

Shared with Dropbox

And for those who would like captions, here’s the same thing on YouTube:

Rankine CITIZEN1+2

No Description

You have a choice of writing prompts this time. Please choose one of the following and respond in 500-1000 words on the blog. As always, make sure to include direct references to the text (quotation or paraphrase) and have a clear argument.
  1. Choose an image or two to read and talk about how still images and videos interact with the printed text. How does the image “illustrate” the text? How might the text be read, conversely, as a “caption” of the image? More broadly, why do you think Rankine puts such emphasis on the visual in a book that labels itself as a “lyric,” a mode usually associated with words and sounds only?
  2. Discuss Rankine’s use of grammatical person (i.e., the “I/we” of the first person, the “you” of the second, and the “he/she/they” of the third). Choose a passage from the text and give a “close reading” of Rankine’s use of pronouns: what’s unusual or unexpected about her use of “person”? Why does she use the pronouns she uses? Who or what seem to be the “antecedents” the pronoun/s point to?
  3. What links can you make with other texts from the course (and you may mention anything from Emerson, Hurston, and Fanon up to our readings of Ellison and Morrison)? Are there direct allusions to anything we read? Are there particular authors/moments that seem especially relevant to Rankine’s narrative?

The Citizen With a Twinkle of Blue in Her Eye

     Claudia Rankine makes a risky, but ultimately effective move, by employing the second-person in her “lyric” Citizen. The second-person point of view creates a dream-like quality in Rankine’s writing which works perfectly when Rankine describes moments from her childhood in part I of the lyric. Claudia Rankine presents her young self as an amalgam of Pecola and Claudia’s characters in Toni Morrison’s novel The Bluest Eye. 

     Rankine’s childhood memories, as recounted in Citizen, are reminiscent of The Bluest Eye’s portrait of black girlhood. Rankine writes:  

Haven’t you said this to a close friend who early in your friendship, when distracted, would you call you by the name of her black housekeeper… you never called her out on it (why not?) and yet, you don’t forget…Do you feel hurt because It’s the “all black people look the same” moment, or because you are being confused with another after being so close to this other (Rankine 7)?   

 Rankine questions her actions when remembering this microaggression. The moment is reminiscent of Claudia MacTeer’s encounters with her community’s idealization of whiteness. When she destroys the white baby doll, she recalls, “all the world had agreed that a blue-eyed, yellow-haired, pink-skinned doll was what every girl treasured… what made people look at [little white girls] and say, ‘Awwwww,’ but not for me” (Morrison 20-22)? Both Rankine and MacTeer interrogate the ways they are rendered inhumane by the world as young black girls. For Rankine, her “friend” makes her replicable and indivisible from her race by calling Rankine the name of her black housekeeper. Rankine is simply “one of them.” For Claudia MacTeer, the world refuses to see her beauty, her specialness by viewing little white girls as the pinnacle of beauty. Claudia MacTeer does not accept the “white is right” mentality, as shown by how she questions little white girls’ beauty. Rankine tries to pin down precisely why her friend’s behavior bothered her. Both young Claudias subconsciously know that the societal behavior they encounter is wrong but can quite wrap their fingers around it. Neither is yet familiar with the history of white supremacy that might make the picture clearer for them. Both girls are constantly questioning, the passages scattered with question marks. However, neither girl receives answers in that moment. 

     Rankine also internalizes racism in a way that more closely mirrors Pecola’s character. Rankine writes that after incidents like the one quoted above:  

An unsettling feeling keeps the body front and center. The wrong words enter your day like a bad egg in your mouth and puke runs down your back… Your own disgust at what you smell, what you feel, doesn’t bring you to your feet (Rankine 8).  

 The racism Rankine encounters doesn’t just make  make her feel metaphorically sick but makes her feel that she as a person is sickening. The things Rankine endures (like the Freudian slip from her friend) damages her self image like how the things Pecola hears and sees feeds into her self hatred. Pecola’s desire for blue eyes and obsession with whiteness as the epitome of beauty proves the hatred she holds for her black self. Morrison illustrates throughout the novel how this self-hatred is produced by the GeraldinesPaulines, Shirley Temple cups, and overall societal obsession with Aryan looking little girls that Pecola encounters. Morrison also even writes, “The Breedloves… were poor and black and… believed they were ugly… it was as though some[one]… had given each one a cloak of ugliness, and they had each accepted it without question” (Morrison 38-39). The Breedlove, including Pecola, are all made to feel ugly (or sick, or disgusting, or wrong). Their ugliness is tied to their poverty, but more importantly their blackness. Their society rooted in white-supremacy – the magical creature with cloaks – cause them to feel this ugliness like the “wrong words” cause Rankine’s self-disgust 

     Claudia Rankine’s childhood experiences mirror two divulging characters in The Bluest Eye: Claudia and Pecola. Rankine is interrogative at times like Claudia, but also susceptible to internalizing racism like Pecola. Rankine’s experiences exemplifhow Morrison’s characters lie in real black women, and long past 1941 where Morrison’s novel takes place. Morrison’s novel shows that neither Pecola nor Claudia’s separate experiences define black girlhood, but that a little bit of each character can be found today in African-American women’s pasts.