Annotated Bibliography

A huge shoutout to @adeladecevic for referring me to Parker’s article.

 Original research question: What is the cultural and historical significant of the food items written about in The Bluest Eye, and do they contribute to the novel’s theme?

     Hinman Abel, Mary. Practical Sanitary and Economic Cooking Adapted to Persons of Moderate and Small Means. American Public Health Organization, 1889, pg.iv, 106.

  • Hinman Abel’s cookbook includes a guide for her idea of proper nutrition and cheap-to-make recipes designed for lower-class families in the late nineteenth century. The cookbook’s recipe for cobbler, the notable dessert Claudia and Frieda spill, is the first time the dish is properly printed with the racialized epithet, “Brown Betty.”

     “Practical Sanitary and Economic Cooking.” Feeding America, The Historic American Cookbook Project, digital.lib.msu.edu/projects/cookbooks/html/books/book_42.cfm.

  • The Historic American Cookbook Project’s introduces Practical Sanitary. The page documents the cookbook’s origins briefly, claiming the cookbook’s tone as straightforward and dispassionate. The page contextualizes the “brown betty,” recipe, as the cookbook is specifically inspired by European cuisine and dining habits.

     Gardaphé, Fred L., and Wenying Xu. “Introduction: Food in Multi-Ethnic Literatures.” MELUS, vol. 32, no. 4, 2007, pp. 5–10. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/30029828.

  • Gardaphé and Xu lay the groundwork for food’s role and significance in multi-ethnic literature. They argue that food serves as a motif that accentuates characters’ ethnicities in these narratives and contributes to subject formation, community formation, and identity.

     Graves, Brian. “You Are What You Beat: Food Metaphors and Southern Black Identity in Twentieth-Century African American Literature and Goodie Mob’s ‘Soul Food.’” Studies in Popular Culture, vol. 38, no. 1, 2015, pp.125-127. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/44259588.

  • Graves argues that food is central to black-southern identity: Southern cuisine can either comfort black characters or expose their rural-blackness and cause identity crises. Graves’s argument is specifically relevant to Pecola’s mother Pauline, a black woman from Alabama who chooses to make an iconic southern dish for her proper, white employers.

     House, Elizabeth B. “The ‘Sweet Life’ in Toni Morrison’s Fiction.” American Literature, vol. 56, no. 2, 1984, pp. 182. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/2925752.

  • House argues that Morrison threads a battle between capitalist versus idyllic values in her work, the former of which is superior though costly to the trajectory of characters’ lives. She claims that Morrison employs food imagery to show these contrasting values.

     Kuenz, Jane. “The Bluest Eye: Notes on History, Community, and Black Female Subjectivity.” African American Review, vol. 27, no. 3, 1993, pp. 421–431. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/3041932.

  • Kuenz argues that The Bluest Eye attempts to rewrite an authentic portrayal black-female subjectivity and portray how black-female subjects are invaded by mass-white culture, specifically black-female sexuality. She claims that Pecola Breedlove experiences arousal from fantasizing about inhabiting a white body, and gets sexual pleasure from eating the Mary Jane candies.

     Lewis, Edna, et al. The Taste of Country Cooking. Alfred A. Knopf, 2006, pp.6-25, 184, 194, 455.

  • Lewis’s cookbook, published in the same decade as The Bluest Eye, pioneered Americans’ appreciation for Southern cooking, exemplifying black pride and representing an idealized, community-oriented food culture in the black community that at times contrasts with Morrison’s more nuanced take. Lewis’s book gives insight into some of the food featured in The Bluest Eye, through recipes and her childhood memories of the foods. Similarly to Morrison’s novel, the cookbook is separated into the sections “Spring,” “Summer,” “Fall,” and “Winter.”

     Parker, Emma. “‘Apple Pie’ Ideology and the Politics of Appetite in the Novels of Toni Morrison.” Contemporary Literature, vol. 39, no. 4, 1998, pp. 620–629. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/1208728.

  • Parker argues that sugar and hunger emphasize and cause black characters’ oppression in Morrison’s novels. She claims that fruit and sugar are associated with capitalism, freedom, and the black race’s history of oppression, contextualizing the significance of the various sweets and fruits referred to throughout The Bluest Eye that highlight the social differences and self-hatred characters associated with these foods have.

Simple Bibliography

     Hinman Abel, Mary. Practical Sanitary and Economic Cooking Adapted to Persons of Moderate and Small Means. American Public Health Organization, 1889, pg.iv, 106.

     Gardaphé, Fred L., and Wenying Xu. “Introduction: Food in Multi-Ethnic Literatures.” MELUS, vol. 32, no. 4, 2007, pp. 5–10. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/30029828.

     Graves, Brian. “You Are What You Beat: Food Metaphors and Southern Black Identity in Twentieth-Century African American Literature and Goodie Mob’s ‘Soul Food.’” Studies in Popular Culture, vol. 38, no. 1, 2015, pp.126. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/44259588.

     House, Elizabeth B. “The ‘Sweet Life’ in Toni Morrison’s Fiction.” American Literature, vol. 56, no. 2, 1984, pp. 182. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/2925752.

     Kuenz, Jane. “The Bluest Eye: Notes on History, Community, and Black Female Subjectivity.” African American Review, vol. 27, no. 3, 1993, pp. 421–431. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/3041932.

I used a combination of JSTOR, Google Scholar, and Hunter College’s Onesearch to find my sources, the latter two often pointed me in the direction of articles from JSTOR. I used the search terms “race,” “black,” “food” and “literature” for the majority of my sources. I used the terms “mary jane candies,” “food,” and “toni morrison” to find relevant existing criticism about my topic. When I was still deciding on my research topic a few weeks ago I went down a rabbit hole trying to research the history of blackberry cobbler (which is a food that appears in TBE). and  found my first source – the cookbook where blackberry cobbler is called a “Brown Betty” for the first time. Though it is an unusual source, the preface and recipe itself sheds light how Morrison uses the dish to say something about blackness, poverty, and class.

Podcast/Essay Recommendation

Great essay featured in  The New York Times’s podcast Modern Love this week read by Lorraine Toussaint. The podcast and the link to the actual essay Toussaint reads can be found below.

Race Wasn’t An Issue To Him, Which Was An Issue To Me | With Lorraine Toussaint

Interracial relationships come with their own complexities, and there are a lot of questions that come up. Questions like: How does your partner think about race? How do you talk about it? What works, and what doesn’t? Kim McLarin writes about race and dating in her piece, which is read by Lorraine Toussaint (“The Village”).

The Citizen With a Twinkle of Blue in Her Eye

     Claudia Rankine makes a risky, but ultimately effective move, by employing the second-person in her “lyric” Citizen. The second-person point of view creates a dream-like quality in Rankine’s writing which works perfectly when Rankine describes moments from her childhood in part I of the lyric. Claudia Rankine presents her young self as an amalgam of Pecola and Claudia’s characters in Toni Morrison’s novel The Bluest Eye. 

     Rankine’s childhood memories, as recounted in Citizen, are reminiscent of The Bluest Eye’s portrait of black girlhood. Rankine writes:  

Haven’t you said this to a close friend who early in your friendship, when distracted, would you call you by the name of her black housekeeper… you never called her out on it (why not?) and yet, you don’t forget…Do you feel hurt because It’s the “all black people look the same” moment, or because you are being confused with another after being so close to this other (Rankine 7)?   

 Rankine questions her actions when remembering this microaggression. The moment is reminiscent of Claudia MacTeer’s encounters with her community’s idealization of whiteness. When she destroys the white baby doll, she recalls, “all the world had agreed that a blue-eyed, yellow-haired, pink-skinned doll was what every girl treasured… what made people look at [little white girls] and say, ‘Awwwww,’ but not for me” (Morrison 20-22)? Both Rankine and MacTeer interrogate the ways they are rendered inhumane by the world as young black girls. For Rankine, her “friend” makes her replicable and indivisible from her race by calling Rankine the name of her black housekeeper. Rankine is simply “one of them.” For Claudia MacTeer, the world refuses to see her beauty, her specialness by viewing little white girls as the pinnacle of beauty. Claudia MacTeer does not accept the “white is right” mentality, as shown by how she questions little white girls’ beauty. Rankine tries to pin down precisely why her friend’s behavior bothered her. Both young Claudias subconsciously know that the societal behavior they encounter is wrong but can quite wrap their fingers around it. Neither is yet familiar with the history of white supremacy that might make the picture clearer for them. Both girls are constantly questioning, the passages scattered with question marks. However, neither girl receives answers in that moment. 

     Rankine also internalizes racism in a way that more closely mirrors Pecola’s character. Rankine writes that after incidents like the one quoted above:  

An unsettling feeling keeps the body front and center. The wrong words enter your day like a bad egg in your mouth and puke runs down your back… Your own disgust at what you smell, what you feel, doesn’t bring you to your feet (Rankine 8).  

 The racism Rankine encounters doesn’t just make  make her feel metaphorically sick but makes her feel that she as a person is sickening. The things Rankine endures (like the Freudian slip from her friend) damages her self image like how the things Pecola hears and sees feeds into her self hatred. Pecola’s desire for blue eyes and obsession with whiteness as the epitome of beauty proves the hatred she holds for her black self. Morrison illustrates throughout the novel how this self-hatred is produced by the GeraldinesPaulines, Shirley Temple cups, and overall societal obsession with Aryan looking little girls that Pecola encounters. Morrison also even writes, “The Breedloves… were poor and black and… believed they were ugly… it was as though some[one]… had given each one a cloak of ugliness, and they had each accepted it without question” (Morrison 38-39). The Breedlove, including Pecola, are all made to feel ugly (or sick, or disgusting, or wrong). Their ugliness is tied to their poverty, but more importantly their blackness. Their society rooted in white-supremacy – the magical creature with cloaks – cause them to feel this ugliness like the “wrong words” cause Rankine’s self-disgust 

     Claudia Rankine’s childhood experiences mirror two divulging characters in The Bluest Eye: Claudia and Pecola. Rankine is interrogative at times like Claudia, but also susceptible to internalizing racism like Pecola. Rankine’s experiences exemplifhow Morrison’s characters lie in real black women, and long past 1941 where Morrison’s novel takes place. Morrison’s novel shows that neither Pecola nor Claudia’s separate experiences define black girlhood, but that a little bit of each character can be found today in African-American women’s pasts.